Monday, September 29, 2014
Saturday, September 27, 2014
Also shared on Facebook HERE
I see you jumped to the defence of your ABC mate John Stewart within seconds, after his shocking outburst was tweeted to you (with the full interaction here). Perhaps that's because in your mind, he's a "Real" human being, while Schapelle and her family are sub-human, working class dross, deserving of all the abuses heaped on them? If they were dark-skinned (though some of them are), I guess I could accuse you of entrenched racism, so let's just call this a glaring example of your entrenched classism and deep contempt for Aussies who toil on the shop floor. Schapelle's Mum slogged her guts out to keep her fish & chip shop on the Gold Coast going, and her deceased Father was a hard working miner.
Why do I say that? Here's more evidence of the ABC's dyed-in-the-wool snob culture you reflexively mirror. According to your colleagues at The Drum, Schapelle and her relatives are (to quote directly), a "Bogan fish-and-chip shop family." You may be interested in my scathing reply to that outrageous piece, which was published in the progressive press. It dissects these deeply disturbing prejudices within Australia's national broadcaster.
Further, here's a deeply troubling litany of facts relating to Schapelle's case that both you (and your employer), refuse to report, and here's some background on the hush money ABC Australia paid petty criminal William Moss after his shocking revelations. And you want more info on the appalling methods of your "Mate" John Stewart? You'll find it here. And one more thing, here's the outcome of very recent, high profile court action you (and all your colleagues), kept their mouths shut about, because the ABC refused to report it. Terrify you did it? It should have done, considering your mate John Stewart conveniently jumped ship before the proverbial hit the fan, and removed his name from the later version of the book.
So here's a reply to you Mark, from Schapelle's so-called "Bogan" mother, sharing the facts you refuse to report over 720 times on Facebook, and all over the Australian media.
And one more thing, it goes without saying you will never reply to this open letter, because you have neither the courage or the facts to back you up. Your silence condemns you.
Posted by Kim at 7:07 PM
Friday, September 26, 2014
Posted by Kim at 6:44 PM
Posted by Kim at 2:38 PM
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
Monday, September 22, 2014
Posted by Kim at 3:33 AM
Posted by Kim at 2:25 AM
Sunday, September 21, 2014
Saturday, September 20, 2014
Thursday, September 18, 2014
Schapelle Corby - The Aussie media seeks to hide their disgusting smears and the legal victory that exposed them
Posted by Kim at 11:55 AM
Posted by Kim at 12:09 AM
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
Saturday, September 6, 2014
Schapelle Corby - QANTAS's criminal workers are STILL free, despite importing 200 kilos of cocaine!!!
The Commonwealth Ombudsman has just sent a letter, refusing to chastise the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity (ACLEI), for their 14 months of silence on a complaint from the public, re the continuing freedom of the QANTAS baggage handlers who helped to import 200 kilos of cocaine into Australia in 2004/5, but were not arrested or charged by the Australian Federal Police. So here’s a new follow up letter (and Freedom of Information application), to ACLEI . . .
In July this year, you assured the Commonwealth Ombudsman that you are investigating my June 2013 complaint (to your organisation), about the QANTAS baggage handlers who helped to import 200 kilos of cocaine into Australia in 2004/5, as fully admitted by the Australian Federal Police in their 2009 report to the Senate (page 8, point 3.1) and as further explained in this 2005 press article. However, despite the seriousness of their crimes, the then Minister for Justice (Jason Claire MP), openly admitted in May 2013 that none of these workers were ever arrested or charged. Obviously, this is a core failure on the part of the Australian Federal Police (considering the outstanding success of the British police in similar circumstances), which cries out for much more serious investigation.
Since you have (apparently), just informed and assured the Commonwealth Ombudsman that you are genuinely “Investigating” my June 2013 complaint, I assume this must have generated some paperwork (given an intervening period of over 14 months), so this is a Freedom of Information application for firstly, all the relevant paperwork re my original complaint to you, and secondly a Freedom of Information application for all your 2014 correspondence with the Commonwealth Ombudsman (and any accompanying evidence you sent them), in relation to the complaint I made to them about your organisation. If the first FOI application turns up a big fat zero (e.g. I get a response which says no such paperwork exists), I’ll put in another complaint to the Commonwealth Ombudsman, on the grounds that your organisation was obviously lying to them.
Obviously, these matter are directly related to Schapelle’s issues, as these criminal baggage handlers were on duty the exact day she flew and at the exact time - and they are also accused of smuggling drugs between domestic airports, using the bags of the unwitting and innocent public to do so.
Schapelle’s last book was a runaway best seller, that broke records and is still selling. The next one will (I’m sure), exceed even the first - so please consider this correspondence part of the evidence trail for inclusion in that certain-to-be released publication. In other words Robert, you can run but you can’t hide.
Posted by Kim at 6:08 PM